ah yes.

christ on a popsicle stick.

a very interesting line of description indeed.

but why popsicle stick? is it a new marketing strategy, not unlike that of the 'phallic' candy?

**INTERRUPTION: the phallic candy, looks *very* innocent. honest!! all i can say is that the singaporean adults are seriously deprived maniacs with twisted minds and an over-active imagination. Shame on them.**

back to christ and his popsicle stick.

oh wait... or is it a very unethical thing to do, crossing religious boundaries?

YES. (so say some people)

so i am assuming that if i do make some comments, a pro-jesus activist would come after me with a bazooka threatening to blow my head off?

YES.

ok then. i won't talk about semantic popsicle sticks.

i will talk about, however, the freedom of speech... or lack thereoff.

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

freedom of speech, as it is, is non-existent.

there are too many factors in the world that would make absolute freedom of speech the swiftest way of suicide. for speech is essentially a form of communication and communication takes place when an audience is present. and with the presence of people (or even the singular) brings upon different ideas and of course, WITH that comes disagreement.

and of course, like how it always turns out to be in the movies, with disagreement comes verbal attacks, followed by physical violence, personal assaults, terrorist attacks... you get the picture.

why, even talking about the freedom of speech can bring on violent disagreement.

=X